In March 2009 I visited the town of Belmonte in Castilla-la Mancha and visited the castle were some of the scenes for the film El Cid were shot. On the way back down after visiting the castle I crossed the exact spot where Charlton Heston and Sophia Loren filmed the closing scenes of El Cid.
El Cid is the national hero of Spain, rather like Queen Elizabeth I or Winston Churchill in the United Kingdom or Abraham Lincoln in the USA. He was a warrior, a nobleman, a knight, and a champion. He became a legend within only a few years of his death and most Spaniards know about him because at school they read an epic poem called El Cantar de Mío Cid. It is the first great poem in the Spanish language and was written about 1140, only fifty years or so after he died.
Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar known as El Cid Campeador, was a Castilian nobleman, a gifted military leader and a diplomat who fought for and then fell out with Alfonso VI, was exiled but later returned, and in the fight against the Moors conquered and governed the city of Valencia on the eastern Mediterranean coast.
It’s a good story but the film takes a few historical liberties so, in truth it is best not to rely upon it as a source document for serious study.
The film is a Hollywood historical epic starring Charlton Heston and Sophia Loren and tells the story of the heroic warrior as he sets about (seemingly single-handedly) recovering Spain from the Moors. With its charismatic stars, a cast of thousands (wearing real armour and using real swords) and its grand themes of love, loyalty and justice, it perpetuates a glowing image of the greatest hero in Spanish history.
Cid is a towering and talismanic figure, the perfect chivalric knight, devoted to his wife and children, a magnificent warrior, unerringly true to his word and merciful to his opponents. Most of all, he is sworn to the service of God and dedicated to saving Spain from the fearsome invaders from North Africa.
The reality of course is that this wasn’t a completely accurate portrayal of the great warrior and the life of ‘El Cid’, from the Arabic sayyid, ‘lord’, differed from the film version in many crucial respects.
One aspect of the film that is somewhat confusing is the relationship between the Cid and some of the Spanish Muslims who he holds in high regard and treats with respect and here we begin with an aspect of the film, which is, broadly speaking, accurate. The Cid’s generosity to some of his Muslim opponents and his alliances with local Muslims against other, more fundamentalist, Islamic armies are based on fact because El Cid was a mercenary who would, in fact, fight for either side if the money on offer was right.
Three centuries before El Cid lived, the Muslims of North Africa had conquered Iberia but slowly the Christians had regained control of the northern half of the peninsula and the two faiths established a practical live and let live arrangement. Relations between the two faiths in Spain had yet to be sharpened by the inflammatory and inflexible rhetoric of crusade and jihad and furthermore, it was quite common for local groups of Christians and Muslims to make alliances to fight other Christians and Muslims. But things were changing and El Cid lived just as the age when the Crusades was beginning and the Christians probably had their eye on the bits of the peninsula with the very best beaches.
El Cid lived at this time and the film shows him having Muslim allies, even though it carefully omits the numerous occasions when he acted for Muslim paymasters against Christians because he was, in short, a warrior for hire, a mercenary, who spent much of his career fighting for whoever paid him the most and the film accurately pays tribute to his formidable military prowess for which others were prepared to pay.
His finest victory was the capture of Valencia in 1094, which is shown in the film on a grand Hollywood epic scale, complete with siege towers, cavalry charges, thousands of movie extras provided by General Franco and the full clash of medieval arms.
So there is at least some truth in the film and its plot, but it on the whole it is a highly romaticised version of the story. The explanation for this lies in the identity of its historical consultant: Ramón Menéndez Pidal, who was the foremost Spanish historian of his age and the author of the standard biography of the Cid, first published in 1929.
The portrait of the Cid Pidal promoted to the movie makers was flawed in two ways. First, in the evidence he used because he gave substantial credibility to the ‘Poema de Mio Cid’, a work written at the height of the crusading age and, most crucially, fifty years after after the Cid’s death. Then, his valiant deeds against Muslims made him a suitable exemplar to inspire a generation of holy warriors fighting the Crusades, and his life quickly moved into the realms of fantasy and legend.
The second reason for Pidal’s inaccurate characterisation of El Cid lies in the blurring between the historian’s version of medieval Iberia and many of his own perceptions about the Spain of his own lifetime. To him, the notion of a patriotic hero uniting his troubled country was highly attractive and one that fitted the nationalist mood of Spain in the 1930s. Hence Heston’s El Cid repeatedly demands a victory ‘for Spain’, when in fact Spain as a national entity was of little relevance in the eleventh century and ‘for Castile’ would have been a much more likely rallying cry.
The end of the film is based entirely on legend. Shortly before he died in 1099 he allegedly saw a vision of St. Peter, who told him that he should gain a victory over the Saracens after his death. So he was clothed in a coat of mail and was mounted upon his favourite horse, Babieca, fastened into the saddle and at midnight was borne out of the gate of Valencia accompanied by an army of a thousand knights.
They marched to where the Moorish king and his army was camped, and at daylight made a sudden attack. The Moors awoke and it seemed to them that there were as many as seventy thousand knights, all dressed in robes of pure white and at their head El Cid holding in his left hand a banner representing Reconquesta and in the other a fiercesome sword, La Tizona.
So afraid were the Moors that they fled to the sea, and twenty thousand of them are said to have drowned as they tried to reach their ships in panic.
Click on an image to scroll through the gallery…
________________________________________________
More posts about El Cid:
El Cid and the Spanish Reconquista
El Cid and his sword. La Tizona
El Cid and the Castle of Belmonte
El Cid – The Film Fact and Fiction
_______________________________________________
Another Bag, More Travel 
I never saw the movie, but I know from Age of Empire-II.
Thank you for your background on El Cid. I had the feeling there would be some inaccuracies on the film but overall, thought it was a very good attempt on their part and it is timeless. As I look back on what has happened to our country over the past few years, I wonder where our ‘political correctness’ has gotten us and if it has really done more harm than good. This often reminds me of the scene with Jimena in the film where El Cid contemplates what he did for the Moors in setting them free on his way home.
Having read this I thought it was very enlightening.
I appreciate you spending some time and energy to put this information together.
I once again find myself personally spending way too
much time both reading and posting comments.
But so what, it was still worth it!
Pingback: European Capital of Culture 2000 – Santiago de Compostela | Have Bag, Will Travel
Pingback: Spain, Belmonte Castle and El Cid | Have Bag, Will Travel